Digital And Digital Immigrants By Marc Presky - 1668 Words

The article â€Å"Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants by Marc Presky, appears in the book On the Horizon. The article asserts that due to the the anacrusis of the digital age, this generation has changed dramatically, thus, it is no longer possible to reach them through obsolete teaching methods, as it comes close to teaching them in a foreign language. In order to solve this issue, Presky suggests that we need to update our methodology in order to fit today’s needs better. In the beginning of the article, Prensky implies that student have changed dramatically, thus, are no longer the correct audience for our education system. He goes on by explaining that this change is not exactly a diversification, as in clothes, slang or the†¦show more content†¦Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. Page. 2 - 2001), as he emphasises it. To furthermore clarify this term, he names many examples such as â€Å"bringing people physically into your office to see an interesting web site† (Prensky, Mark. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. Page. 2 - 2001) instead of â€Å"sending them an email† (Prensky, Mark. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. Page. 2 - 2001). Prensky complicates this matter when he embeds it into school routine. He endorses that to digital natives it feels like they are being taught by foreigners who have no wrap their head around English language yet. However, this is a dilemma that only starts, rather than ends, at the lack of communication. By introducing another example, he disputes that there is also a quarrel in the way of thinking in general. Digital natives, for example, believe that studying should be fun and could easily be done, while, for example, watching TV. This Digital Immigrants, however, deny up to this day; simply because they were not capable of doing all those things, while they were young. He then reminds us that, in spite of prevailing belief, one cannot simply presume that students function the same way their teachers did when they were in school. As a result of this, he enters the debate whether â€Å"students should go back to their old ways or if teachers should have to learn this new language† (Prensky, Mark. Digital Natives, Digital

Advantages and Disadvantages Of The Louisiana Purchase - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 997 Downloads: 7 Date added: 2019/10/31 Category History Essay Level High school Tags: The Louisiana Purchase Essay Did you like this example? The Louisiana Purchase constituted many advantages and disadvantages for President Thomas Jefferson and for the country. Some of the moral dilemmas included were, whether to purchase Louisiana and turning on what the constitution says. Jefferson believed in strict constructionism meaning he found ways to incorporate ideas for certain instances into the constitutions laws that werent initially written in there. So, while he is having a hard time figuring out whether he should purchase Louisiana, he is also worried about what people may think of him if he disobeys the constitution.   The Louisiana Purchase posed many advantages for the country. Jeffersons decision to buy Louisiana expanded the U.S. massively. By any measure, it was one of the most colossal land transactions in history, involving an area larger than todays France, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Germany, Holland, Switzerland and the British Isles combined (Harriss). If Jefferson would not have made the purchase, the U.S. lands would not be the same. Another advantage to the situation was the underground features. The new land flourished in gold, silver, and many other ores that people would eventually mine and use as currency (Harriss). This meant that more people would immigrate to the United States, increasing the population. With the population increasing, the U.S. needed more housing and jobs available. People began to build up cities and towns until there was more than enough room for everyone. The expansion also led to more agriculture and farming, benefitting the people (paying jobs) and the countr y (Harriss). As people worked in farming, money was made, and the country eventually acheived wealthiness. This contributed to the building of roads and new businesses. The U.S. continued to grow beneficially because of Jeffersons decision. Although there were many influencing aspects of purchasing Louisiana, there were also some downfalls. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Advantages and Disadvantages Of The Louisiana Purchase" essay for you Create order Since the purchase expanded the U.S. so greatly, they came across problems that affected how the country grew. Thomas Jefferson was a huge public figure and was viewed as a positive influence to many people, but there were some that did not agree with his ways. He was known for being the one to make sure what he wants to do is done in a constitutional manner. When people accused Jefferson as being unconstitutional because of his strict constructionism, he made sure to prove them wrong. Jefferson had always stated his strong belief that the federal governments powers should be interpreted strictly. Article IV of the Constitution said new states could be added, but made no provision for taking on foreign territories, Jefferson argued that a constitutional amendment was needed. (Jefferson and the Louisiana Purchase). Jefferson struggled to convince the government that there were no rules against buying foreign lands. He eventually decided to try to justify the situation. He wrote in 180 3, The General Government has no powers but such as the Constitution gives it. it has not given it power of holding foreign territory, and still less of incorporating it into the Union. An amendment of the Constitution seems necessary for this. (Jefferson and the Louisiana Purchase). All of this to say, Jefferson did not have a strong bond with his people, and this negatively affected the way the U.S. grew. Along with Jefferson being frowned upon for his doings, there were other disadvantages to the Louisiana Purchase. Before the purchase, France had just taken control over Louisiana. After the U.S. took over Louisiana, Jefferson found out this information and instantly felt differently about the situation. French-controlled Louisiana would become a point of eternal friction with us, he wrote in April 1802, and would force us to marry ourselves to the British fleet and nation. (Greenspan). This instance created some tension between the two countries. Another complication was that of people of the U.S. having an opinion about buying Louisiana. Fisher Ames wrote, We are to give money of which we have too little for land of which we already have too much. (Greenspan). The U.S. had already claimed a lot of land and people began to think that it was too much. Jefferson did not think much about this and still bought it.   Was Thomas Jefferson a bad president? In my opinion, no, he was not a bad president. Jefferson may have used strict constructionism during his presidency (although some did not like it), but it truly exploited the United States future decisions and doings. While Jefferson was president, he accomplished many things. While president, Jeffersons principles were tested in many ways. But Jefferson stood firm in ending the importation of slaves and maintaining his view of the separation of church and state. In the end, Jefferson completed two full and eventful terms as president. He also paved the way for James Madison and James Monroe, his political prot? ©g? ©s, to succeed him in the presidency. (Thomas Jefferson Establishing a Federal Republic). As the article says, he did not back down on his beliefs. He stayed loyal to the country and made it possible for others to become president as well. Jefferson will always be remembered for his intelligent decisions. He led his country to gr eat places and is thanked for doing so.   In the end, I think that purchasing Louisiana had its ups and downs but each one benefited the United States. For better or for worse, I believe that the U.S. would not be where it is today without the Louisiana Purchase. Though we may have had some complications, this decision impacted the country in many ways and could not have been done without Thomas Jefferson. At the beginning, he was not fully trusted but people warmed up to his strict ways and realized that he knew what he was doing. Thomas Jefferson had some moral dilemmas along the way, but they challenged him to be the best president that he could be. He stood strong on his beliefs and never backed down which allowed people of the country to count on him for loyalty.

American Online Case Study Free Essays

Q1: The major explanations to the reason why AOL was so successful in the commercial online industry comparing to its competitors CompuServe and Prodigy are as follows:  · AOL offered the unique and board range of features such as Online Community, Computing and the like, so their services are relatively differentiated  · AOL kept good relation with its customer because of the easy access to AOL’s online service which only required to have a personal computer, a telephone line, and a computer, and also reflected in AOL’s rate structure which was the easiest for consumers to understand and anticipate, relative to its competitors  · The bargaining power of AOL with supplier is achieved by making strategic partnership with American Express, and so on; and completing its acquisitions of Internet software developers, along with AOL’s growing membership base, in order to strengthen its new interactive services industry by means of pursuing a number of initiatives .  · The threat of new enchant is low, since there is not much service providers, like AOL, acted as middlemen between thousands of content providers and millions of customers, which provided lucrative profits prior to 1995. Q2: There are several crucial changes happened in the commercial online industry in the year of 1995 and after:  · With the advent of the Internet World Wide Web and the entrance of Microsoft Network, content providers had substitution distribution channels that offered greater control over their products  · Under the background that the migration of proprietary services and content to Web sites, the exclusive offerings of AOL was declining, thus it was likely reduce the market share of AOL in the industry and subsequently posed negative effect on its profitability  · Since everyone with a PC was his/her own publisher, customers would sign up for an Internet on-ramp service provided by other companies and they were tend to use the other companies’ browsing software to surf the world’s database, resulted in the situation that content providers were starting to make use of these distribution channels. We will write a custom essay sample on American Online Case Study or any similar topic only for you Order Now Q3. Based on the annual reports and footnotes, AOL’s accounting policy was to capitalize subscriber acquisition costs prior to 1995, which in my view, was not likely to be justified in that period based, for the uncertainty whether ts customers could migrate to the internet still remained since this would probably affect the growth in its subscriber and the profit of its services, although the CFO of AOL attributed the choice to the explanation that the period over which the revenue would be received was matching with the timing the expense, yet there was a rising gap between the reported income and its tax income, except for a big change in its service quality, these two numbers bear a consistent relationship to each other. Q4. The company should shorten the length of amortisation of the acquisition costs instead of extending it. The reason of this assertion are based on the life cycle of the industry which was supposed to be relatively short and because of the constantly cha nging environment of the commercial online industry with huge uncertainties, which was likely to require conservative accounting policy to reflect the financial figures so as to better match revenues with expense. Nevertheless, AOL even extended the amortization period for its subscriber acquisition cost from about 15 months to 24 months, which made it would be tend to face big risks when customers switched to other online service under uncertainty. Therefore, the company’s response seems to be inconsistent with my view. Q5. If AOL followed the policy of expensing subscriber acquisition outlays rather than capitalizing them, there would be a huge amount of subscriber acquisition costs, leading to a comparatively decreasing profit and increase operating loss in the income statement as well as lower equity in the balance sheet for the last same period or compared to its peers, which might lose the attractive looking of the accounting figures when it was eager to raise money from the public market so as to pay its bill. How to cite American Online Case Study, Free Case study samples

Bond Valuation Share JAY and KAY Returns â€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Questions: Consider shares in two companies, JAY and KAY, as follows: Expected Return E(R) Standard Deviation s Correlation Coefficient r Share JAY 12% 18% 0.3 Share KAY 24% 32% a) Calculate the covariance between Share JAY and KAY returns. b) What is the expected return and standard deviation of returns on a portfolio comprising 35% in Share JAY and 65% in Share KAY? c) If you wanted to create a portfolio consisting only of these two shares, how much would you need to invest (weights) in each share so that your portfolio return would be equal to 15.6%? Note: do not round. d) Using the weights calculated in part c); calculate the variance and standard deviation of your portfolio. Answers: (a). Covariance between Share JAY and KAY returns: - To calculate the Covariance between Share JAY and KAY returns following formula is used:- = Standard Deviation of JAY * Standard Deviation of KAY *(Correlation Coefficient) = 18 *32 *(0.3) = 172.6 Hence, Covariance between Share JAY and KAY returns is 172.6 (b). (i) Expected Return: - Expected return means that the return the investor can expect in the future. It is not the accurate return but only expected return. Expected Return = Weight of JAY *(Expected Return) + Weight of KAY * (Expected Return) Expected Return = 0.35*(12) + 0.65 * (24) Expected Return = 19.8% Hence, the Expected Return is 19.8% (ii) Standard Deviation (WA2a2 )+ (WB2B2 )+2 (A*WA*b *WB)* Correlation Coefficient (0.35*0.35*18*18)+(0.65*0.65*32*32)+2(18* 0.35*32*0.65*-0.3) 39.69+32.64 -78.624 393.706 = 19.84 (c). If a portfolio is to create consisting only of these two shares, and to make the portfolio return equal to 15.6% then the investment is to be made of :- Let assume the weight of JAY is W, then the Weight of KAY WILL BE 1-W Desired Portfolio Return = 15.6% 15.6% = W*12%+ (1-W)* 24% 0.156 = 0.12W +0.24- 0.14 W 0.156 -0.24 =-0.12W 0.084 = 0.12W 0.084 / 0.12 = W 0.7 =W Expected weight which is earned is 15.6% Then weight of JAY (W) will be 70% Weight of KAY (1-W) will be 30%. (d). (i) Basis on the above calculation revised Standard Deviation is:- New Weight Standard Deviation JAY 70% 18 KAY 30% 32 = (0.70 * 0.70 *18 *18) + (0.30 * 0.30 * 32 * 32) + 2 (0.70 *18*0.30 *32 *- 0.3) = 158.76 + 92.16 -36.288 = 214.632 = 14.65 (ii) Variance is the square of standard deviation Variance = () 2 = (14.65) 2 Variance = 214.62.